| that had nothinig to do with my tuning. You are avoiding trying to make a statement at this point simply because you know you have been proven wrong by any shadow of a doubt. Wrong about what? That most engines needed rebuilding after failures and that you tuned each one? That's the only statement I ever made. You are backpeddling now, trying to withdrawl statements/implied messages, whatever you want to call them because you realize this. Just because you infer a message does not mean I have implied it. Don't blame me for your inferences. What have I withdrawn? My question to you is, if you dont know anything about the inner workings of tuning, how can you possibly say that my tuning is the reason for failure while completely neglecting all of the other possibilities. I never said that Ash, go read my posts again. I agree with you that SOME engines I have tuned have had issues of one sort or another, but in the same, there are issues with other cars I haven't tuned. Agreed. Its really simple though, I provided all of the tuning parameters for these high-HP vehicles, you dont understand what they mean, My understanding of tuning specifics is not the subject at hand. Furthermore I understand the concepts of tuning and the timing maps you have provided, however neither of those were the subject of my posts. You attempted to change the subject to a non-sequitur then "prove" me wrong when I never made any claim beyond the common factor of the motors was your tuning. and you leave your own ignorance on the subject as your excuse to support your implied message. How ridiculous is that? I didn't imply anything. I clearly stated that it's ironic that your dyno parade consisted of now rebuilt motors. Then you went nuts. You're still going nuts.
mkay?
Kenny...
PETZ Member #5
 SteamyZ. Never had did me wrong. - SL103 07/06/04 11:58:15 |
20:41:10 11/01/05
